Fade to White

February 10th, 2010  |  Published in Uncategorized  |  2 Comments

Op-Ed Contributor

Fade to White

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/05/opinion/05reed.html

By ISHMAEL REED

Precious

Precious

Published: February 4, 2010

Oakland, Calif.

JUDGING from the mail I’ve received, the conversations I’ve had and all that I’ve read, the responses to “Precious: Based on the Novel ‘Push’ by Sapphire” fall largely along racial lines.

Among black men and women, there is widespread revulsion and anger over the Oscar-nominated film about an illiterate, obese black teenager who has two children by her father. The author Jill Nelson wrote: “I don’t eat at the table of self-hatred, inferiority or victimization. I haven’t bought into notions of rampant black pathology or embraced the overwrought, dishonest and black-people-hating pseudo-analysis too often passing as post-racial cold hard truths.” One black radio broadcaster said that he felt under psychological assault for two hours. So did I.

The blacks who are enraged by “Precious” have probably figured out that this film wasn’t meant for them. It was the enthusiastic response from white audiences and critics that culminated in the film being nominated for six Oscars by the Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences, an outfit whose 43 governors are all white and whose membership in terms of diversity is about 40 years behind Mississippi. In fact, the director, Lee Daniels, said that the honor would bring even more “middle-class white Americans” to his film.

Is the enthusiasm of such white audiences and awards committees based on their being comfortable with the stereotypes shown? Barbara Bush, the former first lady, not only hosted a screening of “Precious” but also wrote about it in Newsweek, saying: “There are kids like Precious everywhere. Each day we walk by them: young boys and girls whose home lives are dark secrets.” Oprah Winfrey, whose endorsement assisted the movie’s distribution and its acceptance among her white fanbase, said, “None of us who sees the movie can now walk through the world and allow the Preciouses of the world to be invisible.”

Are Mrs. Bush and Ms. Winfrey suggesting, on the basis of a fictional film, that incest is widespread among black families? Statistics tell us that it’s certainly no more prevalent among blacks than whites. The National Center for Victims of Crime notes: “Incest does not discriminate. It happens in families that are financially privileged, as well as those of low socio-economic status. It happens to those of all racial and ethnic descent, and to those of all religious traditions.”

Given the news media’s tendency to use scandals involving black men, both fictional and real, to create “teaching tools” about the treatment of women, it was inevitable that a black male character associated with incest would be used to begin some national discussion about the state of black families.

This use of movies and books to cast collective shame upon an entire community doesn’t happen with works about white dysfunctional families. It wasn’t done, for instance, with “Requiem for a Dream,” starring the great Ellen Burstyn, about a white family dealing with drug addiction, or with “The Kiss,” a memoir about incest — in that case, a relationship between a white father and his adult daughter.

Such stereotyping has led to calamities being visited on minority communities. I’ve suggested that the Newseum in Washington create a Hall of Shame, which would include the front pages of newspapers whose inflammatory coverage led to explosions of racial hatred. I’m thinking, among many others, of 1921’s Tulsa riot, which started with a rumor that a black man had assaulted a white woman, and resulted in the murder of 300 blacks.

Black films looking to attract white audiences flatter them with another kind of stereotype: the merciful slave master. In guilt-free bits of merchandise like “Precious,” white characters are always portrayed as caring. There to help. Never shown as contributing to the oppression of African-Americans. Problems that members of the black underclass encounter are a result of their culture, their lack of personal responsibility.

It’s no surprise either that white critics — eight out of the nine comments used on the publicity Web site for “Precious” were from white men and women — maintain that the movie is worthwhile because, through the efforts of a teacher, this girl begins her first awkward efforts at writing.

Redemption through learning the ways of white culture is an old Hollywood theme. D. W. Griffith produced a series of movies in which Chinese, Indians and blacks were lifted from savagery through assimilation. A more recent example of climbing out of the ghetto through assimilation is “Dangerous Minds,” where black and Latino students are rescued by a curriculum that doesn’t include a single black or Latino writer.

By the movie’s end, Precious may be pushing toward literacy. But she is jobless, saddled with two children, one of whom has Down syndrome, and she’s learned that she has AIDS.

Some redemption.

Ishmael Reed is the author of the forthcoming “Barack Obama and the Jim Crow Media.”

  • Share/Save/Bookmark

Responses

  1. Aerial says:

    February 10th, 2010at 7:26 am(#)

    Wow this is deep. In Oprah’s defense, she too had been a victim, being sexually abused by several different men, including her cousin and her mother’s boyfriend. So maybe she did see value in the message but we do have to keep in mind Oprah appeals to the masses. She may be African American but her audience is multicultural so with her backing a movie is a guarantee multicultural experience.
    On another note I have heard more non African Americans saying it’s a must see influential movie…

  2. Enjoli says:

    February 15th, 2010at 10:10 am(#)

    Reed couldn’t have said it better.

    It is in the history of white folks to create, support, reward, and in some sick way allow their minds to believe that the images they see on the screen are fact. (i.e Birth of a Nation)

    Mind you it was only a mere four centuries ago, when white folks believed that slavery was a type of redemption for Africans.

    Their self created disease called “The Great White Hope Syndrome” follows them everywhere they go in their commercials, films, in their trips to Africa, and in their interference with so called “3rd world country” affairs.

    To fuel this syndrome, movies in which Blacks are portrayed in subservient positions, as illiterate, as weak, and sometimes as evil, stroke the psychotic belief that without them the “poor Black people would suffer”. Let us not forget the 2009 film The Blind Side about a country woman who invites a homeless young Black man into her home in which she begins life coaching him on “proper” English, and football. Here are a few summaries of the film for you:

    A poor, oversized and under-educated teenager is recruited by a major college football program where he is groomed into an athletically and academically successful NFL prospect. Written by IMDb editor

    “The Blind Side” depicts the story of Michael Oher, a homeless African-American youngster from a broken home, taken in by the Touhys, a well-to-do white family who help him fulfill his potential. At the same time, Oher’s presence in the Touhys’ lives leads them to some insightful self-discoveries of their own. Living in his new environment, the teen faces a completely different set of challenges to overcome. As a football player and student, Oher works hard and, with the help of his coaches and adopted family, becomes an All-American offensive left tackle

    Words like “groomed”, “under-educated”, “homeless”, “broken home”“help him fulfill”, and even the description of him being African American is offensive because the writer doesn’t clearly state the ethnicity (or lack there of) of the White family. The writers were really trying hard to be P.C in this one- and still they failed.

    When will humanity ride over being P.C?

    –More fuel to the fire.

    Movies where Blacks are portrayed as powerful, smart and confident rarely get praise and the personality traits displayed in these films are considered to be limited to token Blacks, which dismiss the truth of the film. Yet films that berate us, are praised, awarded, and unfortunately become the blueprint for an entire people.

    I ask myself, how much say-so do we have about our portrayals on the big screen? and How does this change?

    I think we need to write and produce are own movies that portray us in a way that is true for us. And continually boycott films that aren’t in alignment with the truth about ourselves.

Leave a Response


Archives

Categories